Buyer Input Data (BID)
People We Work With:
Why Buyer Input Data Matters
Every sales organization says they want accurate forecasts, healthy pipelines, and deals that close. Yet most pipelines are stuffed with “hope deals”—opportunities that look promising in CRM but have little chance of closing because they lack real buyer validation.
The reason is simple: most sellers capture opinions, not evidence.
They log call notes that summarize conversations. They record activity counts. They update CRM stages. But what’s almost always missing is hard, decision-grade buyer data—the facts about the buyer’s problem, its impact, and what it will take for them to make a change.
That’s why ASG created Buyer Input Data (BID).
BID is not just another checklist—it’s the connective tissue of the entire Problem-Centric OS™.
- It is taught and defined in the Skills Layer.
- It is captured and reinforced in the Opportunity Layer.
- It is consumed and validated in the Forecast Layer.
Without BID, your OS collapses. Skills become theater. Opportunities become opinion. Forecasts become fiction.
What BID Is
Buyer Input Data (BID) is the structured set of problem-centric evidence sellers must collect in every deal to prove it is real, winnable, and forecastable.
It has three core components:
- What problem(s) does the buyer admit to having?
- What are the symptoms and pain points they experience?
- Are the root causes identified and agreed upon?
- How much is the problem costing the business today?
- What risks, inefficiencies, or missed opportunities are tied to it?
- How often does it occur, and what has been the cost of “fixing on the fly”?
- What does the buyer want to achieve that they cannot do today?
- What is the size of the gap between current state and future state?
- What is the urgency to close that gap?
When captured consistently, BID transforms a deal from “rep opinion” to buyer evidence.
Why BID Is Different
Traditional CRM fields and sales processes ask reps to capture activity: “Next Step,” “Decision Maker,” “Close Date.” But none of that proves the deal is real.
BID is different because it forces reps to:
- Anchor discovery in problems and impacts, not just surface-level needs.
- Quantify the business case for change directly from buyer input.
- Link training (Skills Layer) to live execution (Opportunity Layer).
- Feed the Forecast Layer with evidence that can be tested against the 4Cs Buyer Confidence Model.
In other words:
BID turns conversations into data, and data into evidence.
Example: Bad Notes vs. Buyer Input Data
- “Buyer wants to modernize their system.”
- “They seemed interested in our automation features.”
- “Next step: demo with IT team.”
These notes don’t prove urgency, quantify value, or validate the business problem. They’re just seller impressions.
- Problem: Current order management system causes 22% of orders to be manually reworked.
- Impact: Rework adds 1,500 hours of labor per quarter, costing ~$210,000 annually.
- Root Cause: Legacy integrations can’t handle new product SKUs.
- Desired Outcome: Eliminate rework and recover $200K+ annually; scale for 20% SKU growth.
- Decision Criteria: Must integrate with existing ERP within 90 days.
- Buying Process: CFO requires validated cost savings and a 3-year ROI model for approval.
This is the difference between “rep guesswork” and decision-grade buyer evidence. With BID, managers can inspect deal health, reps can build urgency, and leaders can forecast with confidence.
Where BID Fits in the OS
BID is the through-line across all three layers:
- Skills Layer: Reps are trained on what to capture (problems, impacts, root causes, desired outcomes) using the Problem Identification Chart (PIC). Without this foundation, reps don’t know what “good BID” looks like.
- Opportunity Layer: BID is captured in live deals and reinforced through deal reviews, call coaching, and CRM checkpoints. Managers use BID as the inspection point: is this deal real or just a hope deal?
- Forecast Layer: BID becomes the raw evidence that fuels the 4Cs Buyer Confidence Model. You can’t test for Clarity, Control, Consensus, or Change Confidence without BID. If BID isn’t there, forecasts default to rep opinion and optimism.
“Before we started working with ASG, our sales cycle was somewhere between nine and 18 months depending on the deal size. When we look at just the first quarter post training, the sales cycle is 89 days.”
Alicia Rasta, EVP and Head of Global Sales – Televerde
What Happens Without BID
When BID is missing, sales orgs experience the same predictable failures:
- Pipelines full of ghosts. Deals progress through stages without any buyer-validated evidence.
- Forecasting chaos. Numbers are built on intuition and “happy ears,” not data.
- Manager blindness. Leaders can’t coach because they can’t see what’s really happening inside deals.
- Buyer frustration. Reps push solutions without fully understanding the buyer’s world, leading to misfit purchases and stalled deals.
Our How Buyers Want to Be Sold research proves this:
- 54% of buyers had to rescope or re-evaluate after starting their purchase.
- 41% admitted they bought the wrong solution the first time.
- 63% wished salespeople pushed them harder to think through their situation.
- 72% said the process focused more on the solution than their actual problem.
The reason? Sellers weren’t capturing BID.
How to Assess Your BID Discipline
Ask yourself:
Is BID a required part of discovery?
Or do reps move deals forward without problem and impact data?
Is BID structured in CRM?
Do we have fields or frameworks that capture problems, impacts, root causes, and desired outcomes?
Do managers inspect BID?
Are deal reviews anchored in BID evidence, or just pipeline hygiene and dates?
Is BID tied to forecast criteria?
Are forecast calls built on BID validation before a deal can be included?
Do we measure BID quality?
Are managers scoring or auditing BID for completeness and accuracy?
Does training reinforce BID capture?
Do reps know that demonstrating skills means capturing evidence, not just “sounding good” on calls?
The Right Way to Leverage BID
When executed consistently, BID delivers:
- Cleaner pipelines. Fewer “ghost deals” because every opportunity is validated by buyer evidence.
- Higher win rates. Reps anchor deals in the buyer’s problem and impact, creating urgency to act.
- Forecast accuracy. Numbers reflect reality because they’re built on hard evidence.
- Better coaching. Managers inspect BID, not opinions, and coach reps toward stronger discovery and deal strategy.
- Buyer trust. Buyers feel understood and respected because reps diagnose first, prescribe later.
Closing Thought
Buyer Input Data is the backbone of the Problem-Centric OS™.
- It is taught in the Skills Layer.
- It is captured in the Opportunity Layer.
- It is consumed in the Forecast Layer.
BID ensures that skills aren’t just taught—they’re applied, reinforced, and transformed into evidence that leaders can trust. Without BID, you have a pipeline full of opinions. With BID, you have a pipeline full of truth.
That’s why BID is the bridge between training and outcomes, between activity and evidence, between hope and predictable revenue.
ASG didn’t just invent a new checklist—we built BID as part of a full operating system to finally connect skills, opportunity execution, and forecasting into one cohesive model.
Because if you don’t capture buyer input, you’re not selling—you’re guessing.
When Every Fix Fails, It’s Time for a System
Let’s talk about how the Problem Centric™ OS can drive predictable growth in your organization.